H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Tommy Haas H2H: 4-0

David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2013 Madrid Masters fourth round 7-5 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #4 7-5 4-6 6-4 Tommy Haas #13 Match data
Mar 30, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard David Ferrer #5 4-6 6-2 6-3 Tommy Haas #18 Match data
Mar 6, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #4 6-3 6-0 Tommy Haas #35 Match data
Nov 5, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet David Ferrer #17 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Tommy Haas #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15