H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
David Lewis vs Mark Dickson H2H: 0-2
Mark Dickson holds a 2–0 lead over David Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1988 Indianapolis second round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1988* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Mark Dickson | 6-2 7-6 | David Lewis | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1988* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Mark Dickson | 6-4 6-4 | David Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lewis | #1,090 | #152 | 89 | 1,521 | 8 | 21 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Lewis | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #415 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #282 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #398 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |