H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
David Lloyd vs Cliff Richey H2H: 0-2
Cliff Richey holds a 2–0 lead over David Lloyd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1969 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Cliff Richey | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | David Lloyd | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1968* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Cliff Richey | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | David Lloyd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lloyd | #826 | #128 | 0 | 1,568 | 35 | 71 | 33.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Lloyd | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1970 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1972 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1973 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #215 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #255 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #374 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |