H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Lloyd vs Tom Edlefsen H2H: 1-0
David Lloyd holds a 1–0 lead over Tom Edlefsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Lloyd leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Lloyd won the 1968 Bristol third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1968* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | David Lloyd | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lloyd | #826 | #128 | 0 | 1,568 | 35 | 71 | 33.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tom Edlefsen | #172 | #94 | 0 | 1,734 | 109 | 147 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Lloyd | Tom Edlefsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 26–25 | 51.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #215 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #255 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #374 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #111 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #118 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |