H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Lloyd vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 0-4
Vladimir Zednik holds a 4–0 lead over David Lloyd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vladimir Zednik leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1972 Washington third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1972* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Vladimir Zednik | 6-2 6-1 | David Lloyd | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1972* | Hampton | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vladimir Zednik | 6-3 6-1 | David Lloyd | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1972* | New York | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Vladimir Zednik | 6-3 6-2 | David Lloyd | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1970* | London 3 | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Vladimir Zednik | 7-6 4-6 7-6 | David Lloyd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lloyd | #826 | #128 | 0 | 1,568 | 35 | 71 | 33.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Lloyd | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1972 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1973 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #215 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #255 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #374 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |