H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
D. Nainkin vs M. Petchey H2H: 1-0
D. Nainkin holds a 1–0 lead over M. Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Nainkin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, D. Nainkin won the 1995 Beijing fourth round 7-6(7) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1995* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | D. Nainkin | 7-6(7) 7-5 | M. Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Nainkin | #910 | #132 | 350 | 1,628 | 26 | 43 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | D. Nainkin | M. Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #163 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #173 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #136 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |