H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 4-1

David Nalbandian holds a 4–1 lead over Agustin Calleri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Barcelona third round 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 1, 2008* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #7 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Agustin Calleri #60 Match data
May 18, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Agustin Calleri #31 6-4 6-1 David Nalbandian #13 Match data
Mar 6, 2003* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #10 7-6(3) 6-3 Agustin Calleri #40 Match data
Oct 25, 2002* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet David Nalbandian #18 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Agustin Calleri #44 Match data
May 29, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Nalbandian #32 6-2 5-7 6-2 6-4 Agustin Calleri #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Agustin Calleri #894 #16 1,405 1,902 199 182 52.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Agustin Calleri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1999 3–3 50.0% #140 1,537 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2000 11–5 68.8% #62 1,752 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2001 11–16 40.7% #67 1,659 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2002 25–23 52.1% #50 1,722 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2003 33–23 58.9% #24 1,726 0 1
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2004 19–17 52.8% #58 1,690 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2005 21–21 50.0% #51 1,665 0 1
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2006 30–19 61.2% #29 1,800 0 2
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2007 23–24 48.9% #42 1,736 0 2
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2008 20–21 48.8% #60 1,654 0 2
32 2009 3–10 23.1% #391 1,576 0 2