H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 2-1

David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2012 Belgrade semifinal 2-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andreas Seppi #46 2-6 6-2 7-5 David Nalbandian #49 Match data May 5, 2012* SF Belgrade ATP 250 Clay
David Nalbandian #3 7-5 7-5 Andreas Seppi #54 Match data Apr 20, 2006* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
David Nalbandian #10 6-4 6-3 Andreas Seppi #135 Match data Oct 14, 2004* R32 Vienna Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,979 367 401 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,593 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,685 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2008 28–28 50.0% #35 1,750 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,756 0 0
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,807 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2012 36–25 59.0% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,833 0 3
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2014 23–28 45.1% #45 1,770 0 3
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,861 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2016 19–24 44.2% #87 1,794 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,742 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,782 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,751 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,654 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,653 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,619 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Seppi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 13 17 30 43.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 10 16 26 38.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 16 16 32 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 182 219 401 45.4% 120 123 243 49.4% 61 49 110 55.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 759/768 of Andreas Seppi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Seppi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% 2003 2/2 2.5 2.0 58.0% 60.3% 53.3% 50.0% 28.2% 57.3% 37.3%
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 2004 14/14 3.2 3.8 56.9% 69.3% 45.0% 54.9% 38.8% 59.0% 37.1%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2005 33/33 4.3 3.1 56.9% 69.9% 49.9% 63.8% 43.9% 61.1% 37.2%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2006 46/47 3.7 3.7 55.5% 66.5% 48.7% 55.9% 40.6% 58.5% 36.9%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2007 43/43 4.7 3.4 57.8% 69.5% 50.9% 58.5% 44.2% 61.7% 38.2%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2008 54/56 4.6 3.3 58.3% 70.3% 49.8% 57.5% 42.7% 61.7% 38.8%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2009 51/51 4.0 2.6 60.1% 68.7% 49.4% 53.6% 37.9% 60.9% 38.6%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2010 52/52 4.2 2.2 61.3% 68.3% 52.8% 56.2% 41.5% 62.3% 38.8%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2011 49/49 5.0 2.4 58.1% 69.6% 50.5% 56.1% 44.8% 61.5% 36.8%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2012 59/61 4.4 1.8 61.4% 71.1% 51.3% 53.9% 48.4% 63.6% 38.8%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2013 55/55 5.2 3.1 59.3% 70.8% 49.4% 52.1% 37.8% 62.1% 38.5%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2014 50/51 5.1 2.9 57.4% 69.1% 50.9% 60.4% 37.7% 61.3% 36.3%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2015 49/50 5.4 2.2 56.1% 72.9% 50.2% 60.7% 41.8% 63.0% 38.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 41/43 4.9 2.7 56.6% 71.9% 51.3% 52.2% 42.4% 63.0% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 7.7 2.6 56.8% 72.9% 50.0% 59.3% 43.3% 63.2% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 5.8 2.7 58.6% 73.6% 49.1% 60.0% 45.4% 63.5% 37.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 41/41 6.4 3.1 57.8% 70.4% 48.9% 53.1% 42.9% 61.4% 35.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 4.8 2.0 62.0% 68.5% 50.8% 55.0% 43.9% 61.9% 36.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 6.6 2.8 56.1% 68.5% 49.9% 56.5% 46.7% 60.4% 36.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 5.0 2.1 57.7% 68.1% 46.4% 57.2% 41.3% 59.5% 32.7%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 759/768 5.0 2.8 58.3% 70.2% 50.1% 56.6% 42.3% 61.8% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Seppi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 2003 1464 98.8 -1.82 -2.29 0.875 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.12
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 2004 1593 115.2 -0.75 +0.43 0.906 48.1% -16 -39 — 37.8% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 102.7 -0.78
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 2005 1685 130.1 -0.99 -0.10 0.955 49.2% -130 +52 — 49.4% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) 106.5 -1.12
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2006 1554 122.1 -2.81 -0.76 0.888 47.8% -35 +47 +127 40.7% -0.58 9–7 (56%) 7–12 (37%) 99.4 +0.63
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2007 1733 129.5 -1.54 +1.61 0.996 50.0% -57 +1 -108 44.3% -0.13 8–4 (67%) 9–13 (41%) 102.9 +0.24
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2008 1751 145.6 -0.69 +2.66 1.011 50.3% -26 -6 -45 48.0% +0.10 15–10 (60%) 5–17 (23%) 96.4 -1.47
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2009 1757 150.2 -0.94 +2.35 0.989 49.6% -46 +23 -10 43.7% -0.36 10–7 (59%) 9–15 (38%) 98.5 -2.26
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2010 1720 141.7 -0.45 +1.85 1.030 50.2% -70 +114 -46 47.6% -0.14 6–9 (40%) 9–10 (47%) 98.0 -0.33
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2011 1808 145.9 -0.91 -0.36 0.957 49.4% -71 -3 +26 48.3% +0.02 13–7 (65%) 6–12 (33%) 102.2 -0.68
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2012 1921 156.8 +0.87 +2.33 1.065 50.9% -79 +76 -102 55.3% +0.21 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.77
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2013 1834 154.3 -0.73 +1.80 1.015 50.0% -18 +59 +107 48.0% -0.11 12–12 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 96.0 +0.56
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2014 1771 155.3 -0.89 +0.23 0.940 48.9% -14 +128 — 47.3% -0.12 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) 98.3 -1.46
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2015 1862 160.3 -0.29 +3.23 1.032 50.3% -22 -18 +98 48.8% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 8–11 (42%) 99.5 -1.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1795 150.0 -0.29 -0.63 0.962 49.4% -16 +5 +142 43.0% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–7 (50%) 102.2 -0.56
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1743 138.5 -0.29 -0.23 0.995 49.8% +20 -11 +131 46.1% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 9–13 (41%) 101.1 -0.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1782 144.8 -0.59 +1.09 1.021 50.4% +23 -24 +48 53.8% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 13–11 (54%) 99.0 +1.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1751 145.2 -1.93 -0.58 0.911 48.4% +46 -95 +48 44.6% -0.55 8–9 (47%) 13–6 (68%) 102.3 -1.18
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1654 129.8 -0.98 -0.81 0.953 49.2% +101 — — 48.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.62
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1653 123.3 -2.23 -0.39 0.917 48.5% +16 -68 +137 40.0% -0.55 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 +1.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1619 114.5 -1.92 -2.82 0.807 47.3% -12 — — 33.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.06
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1980 149.1 -0.85 +0.97 0.981 49.6% -25 +34 +49 46.9% -0.17 146–125 (54%) 149–176 (46%) 100.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.