H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 2-1
David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2012 Belgrade semifinal 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2012* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andreas Seppi | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2006* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 7-5 7-5 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2004* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-4 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |