H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 4-0

David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2007 Madrid Masters second round 5-7 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #25 5-7 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #40 Match data
Jun 30, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass David Nalbandian #3 6-4 6-4 6-3 Arnaud Clement #57 Match data
Oct 24, 2003* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet David Nalbandian #9 4-1 (ret.) Arnaud Clement #26 Match data
Mar 13, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #46 7-6(5) 6-3 Arnaud Clement #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Arnaud Clement
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4