H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 4-0

David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2007 Madrid Open first round 5-7 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #25 5-7 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #40 Match data Oct 17, 2007* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Nalbandian #3 6-4 6-4 6-3 Arnaud Clement #57 Match data Jun 30, 2006* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Nalbandian #9 4-1 (ret.) Arnaud Clement #26 Match data Oct 24, 2003* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Nalbandian #46 7-6(5) 6-3 Arnaud Clement #43 Match data Mar 13, 2002* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,975 302 315 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Arnaud Clement
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,642 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,621 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2000 36–26 58.1% #18 1,908 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,815 0 1
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,817 0 2
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2004 14–22 38.9% #106 1,629 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,738 0 2
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,798 0 4
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,702 0 4
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,752 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,682 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,664 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,635 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Arnaud Clement
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 6 11 17 35.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2001 24 13 37 64.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 12 13 25 48.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 11 9 20 55.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 10 11 21 47.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 13 11 24 54.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 18 11 29 62.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2008 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 17 26 34.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 174 171 345 50.4% 39 63 102 38.2% 50 43 93 53.8% 39 38 77 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 337/342 of Arnaud Clement's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Arnaud Clement
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2003 50/51 5.3 2.4 56.3% 72.5% 51.6% 59.7% 42.5% 63.4% 41.1%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2004 34/36 5.1 2.9 56.2% 73.7% 51.8% 56.0% 33.6% 64.0% 35.1%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2005 36/37 5.8 2.8 56.0% 71.9% 48.2% 54.6% 38.3% 61.3% 36.8%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2006 47/47 5.0 1.8 58.2% 71.5% 53.6% 59.9% 42.8% 64.2% 38.9%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2007 49/49 5.5 2.7 55.7% 76.5% 51.9% 56.5% 37.6% 65.5% 35.4%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2008 27/27 6.6 2.9 55.3% 69.9% 50.4% 58.8% 36.1% 61.2% 35.6%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2009 34/34 3.7 2.4 58.5% 69.9% 47.9% 61.1% 34.3% 60.9% 35.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 39/39 4.9 2.2 56.4% 71.2% 49.4% 56.4% 40.5% 61.5% 35.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 16/17 5.4 3.1 55.9% 72.6% 47.9% 55.7% 48.7% 61.9% 35.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 5/5 7.2 3.8 56.0% 67.5% 50.4% 60.1% 46.1% 60.1% 37.4%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 337/617 5.3 2.5 56.6% 72.3% 50.7% 57.9% 39.3% 62.9% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Arnaud Clement
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.30 1997 1643 133.3 — — — — +9 -121 +17 51.0% -0.10 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.09
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.80 1998 1621 130.3 — — — — +9 -116 +11 38.7% -0.84 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.69
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.37 1999 1690 140.1 — — — — +9 -132 -67 46.7% -0.25 7–8 (47%) 3–14 (18%) — -1.51
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.96 2000 1908 149.1 — — — — +8 -337 -276 53.6% +0.22 13–10 (57%) 14–6 (70%) — -3.08
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) — +0.79 2001 1769 139.6 — — — — +46 -229 -124 53.9% +0.37 10–10 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.18
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.24 2002 1816 141.6 — — — — -24 -227 -73 58.3% +0.51 2–9 (18%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.05
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 2003 1817 139.0 +0.67 +2.97 1.121 52.0% +5 -123 -16 59.7% +0.47 9–10 (47%) 15–9 (63%) — +1.58
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) — +1.15 2004 1629 133.4 0.00 +0.38 0.975 49.6% +56 -24 +123 43.3% -0.29 2–9 (18%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.33
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35 2005 1738 137.6 -0.72 +0.35 0.950 49.4% +9 -121 — 48.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.41
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.13 2006 1799 148.4 +2.29 +2.03 1.088 51.4% +25 -189 -88 54.4% +0.34 9–7 (56%) 13–5 (72%) — -2.40
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.83 2007 1703 139.6 +1.15 +1.02 1.026 50.2% -17 -108 +106 46.7% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 10–21 (32%) — -1.44
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.55 2008 1636 123.7 -1.41 -0.99 0.918 48.5% -40 -110 +244 43.4% -0.58 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.32
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2009 1752 136.1 -1.61 -0.33 0.906 48.7% +30 -187 -8 41.4% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1683 138.5 -1.51 -0.46 0.921 48.6% -9 -122 +106 39.4% -0.55 5–6 (45%) 2–12 (14%) — -1.72
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1664 121.1 -0.97 -0.87 0.941 49.4% -38 — +109 43.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.04
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1635 110.9 -1.82 +1.02 0.937 49.0% +18 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 0–2 — +0.01
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1975 144.3 -0.01 +0.76 0.995 50.0% +9 -159 +20 49.2% -0.04 86–111 (44%) 118–114 (51%) 95.7 -1.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.