H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 4-0
David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2013 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2013* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-0 6-3 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-4 6-1 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Carlos Berlocq | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |