H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 4-0

David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2013 Argentina Open first round 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #78 6-3 2-6 6-3 Carlos Berlocq #77 Match data Feb 21, 2013* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
David Nalbandian #85 6-0 6-3 Carlos Berlocq #43 Match data Feb 25, 2012* QF Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
David Nalbandian #19 6-2 2-6 6-2 Carlos Berlocq #65 Match data Feb 3, 2011* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay
David Nalbandian #7 6-2 6-4 6-1 Carlos Berlocq #84 Match data May 27, 2008* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Carlos Berlocq
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Carlos Berlocq
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Carlos Berlocq
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Carlos Berlocq
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.80 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.37 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.96 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) — +0.79 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.77
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.24 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.33
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.13 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.59
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.83 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.93
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.55 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.20
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.42
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.65
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.39
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.