H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Carlos Moya H2H: 4-3

David Nalbandian holds a 4–3 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2007 Paris Masters third round 6-4 6-4.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #21 6-4 6-4 Carlos Moya #16 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Carlos Moya #19 7-6(4) 7-6(2) David Nalbandian #23 Match data
Apr 27, 2007* Barcelona ATP 500 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #14 6-4 6-3 Carlos Moya #33 Match data
May 10, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Carlos Moya #8 6-3 6-3 6-1 David Nalbandian #6 Match data
Apr 13, 2002* Estoril ATP 250 SF Clay David Nalbandian #47 6-4 5-7 6-4 Carlos Moya #29 Match data
Sep 27, 2001* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #65 6-2 4-6 6-3 Carlos Moya #19 Match data
Jul 21, 2001* Umag ATP 250 SF Clay Carlos Moya #20 6-4 7-5 David Nalbandian #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20