H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 1-0
David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Danai Udomchoke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2 1-6 6-7(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-2 1-6 6-7(4) 6-1 | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Danai Udomchoke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |