H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Daniel Koellerer holds a 1–0 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Koellerer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Koellerer won the 2009 Mexican Open first round 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Koellerer | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | David Nalbandian | Match data | Feb 26, 2009* | R32 | Mexican Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,078 | 358 | 187 | 65.7% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Daniel Koellerer | #385 | #55 | 904 | 1,653 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Nalbandian | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 2,001 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,909 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,983 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,941 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,034 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,014 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,964 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #82 | 1,880 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,869 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| David Nalbandian | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 21 | 10 | 31 | 67.7% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2009 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2010 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 180 | 98 | 278 | 64.7% | 125 | 66 | 191 | 65.4% | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | Career | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 53/53 of Daniel Koellerer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| David Nalbandian | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2000 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 51.0% | 68.0% | 35.6% | 59.2% | 15.0% | 52.1% | 31.4% | 2003 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 67.9% | 58.3% | 35.3% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 50.9% | 33.9% |
| 2001 | 23/26 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 62.0% | 68.7% | 53.8% | 54.5% | 52.8% | 63.1% | 45.3% | 2004 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 71.5% | 61.8% | 55.8% | 55.4% | 39.9% | 60.0% | 44.5% |
| 2002 | 54/59 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 58.4% | 66.4% | 53.3% | 58.8% | 48.2% | 61.0% | 40.2% | 2005 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 74.7% | 65.9% | 55.9% | 62.0% | 32.5% | 62.8% | 36.5% |
| 2003 | 57/58 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 57.7% | 69.4% | 52.6% | 50.2% | 49.3% | 62.2% | 42.7% | 2007 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 52.0% | 68.9% | 52.1% | 16.7% | 46.8% | 60.8% | 49.5% |
| 2004 | 47/47 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 60.0% | 70.1% | 53.2% | 59.7% | 50.0% | 63.2% | 41.3% | 2008 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 70.0% | 59.2% | 54.6% | 36.7% | 39.4% | 57.0% | 35.1% |
| 2005 | 59/59 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 61.6% | 68.9% | 54.8% | 51.7% | 48.8% | 63.7% | 43.9% | 2009 | 27/27 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 69.3% | 64.3% | 49.6% | 56.9% | 46.2% | 59.8% | 35.7% |
| 2006 | 55/55 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 60.9% | 68.1% | 55.3% | 64.5% | 49.1% | 63.0% | 41.4% | 2010 | 14/14 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 65.6% | 62.1% | 42.1% | 48.7% | 50.1% | 54.4% | 33.2% |
| 2007 | 48/48 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 57.1% | 73.4% | 51.8% | 62.5% | 46.6% | 64.2% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 51/54 | 5.3 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 73.8% | 53.2% | 60.4% | 48.3% | 65.4% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 21/22 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 51.6% | 70.5% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 54.6% | 62.5% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 34/35 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 58.5% | 73.4% | 50.4% | 55.6% | 48.0% | 64.1% | 42.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 32/33 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 58.1% | 70.0% | 52.7% | 62.5% | 38.8% | 62.5% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 35/36 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 58.0% | 70.2% | 53.2% | 56.6% | 43.1% | 63.2% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 11/11 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 58.0% | 69.9% | 49.6% | 47.1% | 59.8% | 61.4% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 529/545 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 58.8% | 70.1% | 53.1% | 57.2% | 48.2% | 63.1% | 41.5% | Career | 53/53 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 68.1% | 63.5% | 48.4% | 52.0% | 45.8% | 58.3% | 36.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| David Nalbandian | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2000 | 1482 | 102.2 | -1.59 | -1.12 | 0.655 | 42.3% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.08 | 2003 | 1475 | 97.7 | -1.06 | -0.96 | 0.692 | 42.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 2001 | 1739 | 145.8 | +1.20 | +5.17 | 1.229 | 53.9% | -114 | +18 | — | 60.3% | +1.05 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.30 | 2004 | 1521 | 101.4 | -2.70 | +2.78 | 1.113 | 51.9% | — | +33 | — | 55.6% | +0.34 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.12 |
| 2002 | 1857 | 144.2 | -0.29 | +2.49 | 1.030 | 50.5% | -88 | -84 | -106 | 56.4% | +0.27 | 14–8 (64%) | 16–8 (67%) | — | -0.80 | 2005 | 1509 | 104.8 | -1.67 | -1.99 | 0.982 | 49.7% | — | +25 | — | 37.5% | -0.87 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| 2003 | 2002 | 153.3 | +0.97 | +5.48 | 1.130 | 52.3% | +9 | -255 | -154 | 62.7% | +0.64 | 8–11 (42%) | 15–9 (63%) | — | +0.37 | 2006 | 1514 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1910 | 152.1 | +1.43 | +3.62 | 1.123 | 52.4% | +18 | +13 | — | 65.4% | +0.95 | 7–6 (54%) | 13–7 (65%) | — | +0.96 | 2007 | 1541 | 111.9 | +1.61 | +0.92 | 1.265 | 55.0% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.18 |
| 2005 | 1983 | 155.5 | +1.22 | +6.61 | 1.209 | 53.5% | +13 | -68 | -66 | 64.8% | +0.98 | 7–9 (44%) | 13–13 (50%) | — | +0.79 | 2008 | 1526 | 112.0 | -1.73 | -1.29 | 0.817 | 45.5% | — | -17 | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.19 |
| 2006 | 1941 | 157.1 | +0.94 | +4.60 | 1.118 | 52.2% | +6 | +128 | -31 | 66.0% | +1.00 | 11–8 (58%) | 7–13 (35%) | — | +0.24 | 2009 | 1616 | 130.9 | -2.40 | -1.25 | 0.889 | 47.8% | +30 | -5 | -138 | 41.3% | -0.69 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.63 |
| 2007 | 2034 | 159.2 | +2.25 | +3.52 | 1.109 | 51.8% | +31 | -57 | -168 | 61.6% | +0.70 | 8–5 (62%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | +0.27 | 2010 | 1542 | 108.7 | -5.84 | -2.45 | 0.729 | 44.1% | +60 | +21 | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.57 |
| 2008 | 2015 | 156.9 | +2.41 | +4.20 | 1.191 | 52.9% | +66 | -36 | -146 | 65.7% | +0.90 | 11–4 (73%) | 16–3 (84%) | — | +1.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1941 | 145.8 | +0.36 | +3.91 | 1.154 | 52.6% | +98 | +24 | — | 63.5% | +0.87 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2015 | 167.2 | +1.51 | +5.37 | 1.181 | 53.2% | +50 | +7 | — | 65.9% | +1.04 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -1.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1965 | 152.5 | +0.32 | +2.26 | 1.049 | 50.5% | +46 | +40 | -25 | 59.2% | +0.41 | 3–0 (100%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | -0.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1881 | 152.2 | +0.89 | +2.86 | 1.077 | 51.5% | +99 | +12 | +43 | 55.3% | +0.34 | 5–7 (42%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | -2.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1870 | 142.5 | -0.16 | +2.69 | 1.057 | 50.9% | +70 | +63 | — | 55.2% | +0.04 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2079 | 161.5 | +1.10 | +4.21 | 1.126 | 52.2% | +21 | -24 | -71 | 62.2% | +0.73 | 92–72 (56%) | 118–80 (60%) | 104.0 | -0.43 | Career | 1654 | 120.2 | -3.07 | -1.30 | 0.865 | 47.2% | +43 | +6 | -138 | 40.0% | -0.80 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 107.0 | +2.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 8 | 11 | 19 | Jun 26, 2011 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 8 | 5 | 13 | Mar 22, 2013 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 4 | 9 | 13 | Feb 22, 2013 | H2H |
| Stan Wawrinka | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 10, 2011 | H2H |
| Tommy Robredo | 6 | 3 | 9 | Feb 19, 2011 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Golubev | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 8, 2010 | H2H |
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 27, 2010 | H2H |
| Steve Darcis | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 16, 2009 | H2H |
| Julien Benneteau | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Nicolas Massu | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 27, 2009 | H2H |