H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Dominik Hrbaty H2H: 1-0

David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2004 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Dominik Hrbaty
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #9 6-3 6-0 Dominik Hrbaty #28 Match data Apr 21, 2004* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,941 328 299 52.3% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Dominik Hrbaty
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,690 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2000 38–28 57.6% #17 1,834 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,677 0 3
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,671 0 3
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,669 0 3
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2004 41–25 62.1% #14 1,739 0 6
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,595 0 6
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2008 4–8 33.3% #253 1,571 0 6
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,651 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,591 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Dominik Hrbaty
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 8 7 15 53.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 23 15 38 60.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 11 10 21 52.4% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 22 18 40 55.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 12 17 29 41.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 29 12 41 70.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 24 15 39 61.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 20 16 36 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 6 12 18 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 171 151 322 53.1% 119 104 223 53.4% 6 18 24 25.0% 32 26 58 55.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 577/626 of Dominik Hrbaty's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Dominik Hrbaty
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% 1997 40/47 5.2 4.8 54.7% 73.2% 49.5% 60.2% 41.6% 62.6% 37.6%
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 1998 50/56 5.0 4.6 53.7% 70.2% 50.9% 55.2% 43.7% 61.1% 39.2%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 1999 51/64 6.5 4.3 53.5% 73.4% 52.0% 59.9% 51.0% 63.3% 39.8%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2000 60/66 6.8 4.1 54.7% 75.1% 51.4% 60.1% 40.4% 64.4% 39.9%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2001 48/57 7.2 5.4 53.5% 71.4% 47.7% 56.8% 44.3% 60.6% 38.7%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2002 48/50 4.0 4.1 57.4% 69.6% 48.7% 55.8% 40.8% 60.7% 37.8%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2003 50/51 4.5 3.0 60.4% 71.9% 52.0% 54.4% 42.5% 63.8% 39.3%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2004 63/66 4.5 2.9 63.7% 71.6% 53.9% 66.7% 43.9% 65.1% 39.6%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2005 62/62 5.1 3.6 58.5% 70.4% 50.6% 64.8% 43.1% 62.2% 40.4%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2006 57/57 4.2 4.5 55.7% 70.2% 48.0% 59.2% 41.8% 60.5% 39.2%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2007 30/30 3.5 4.7 55.9% 67.4% 45.0% 47.0% 36.0% 57.5% 38.3%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2008 10/12 2.2 4.5 60.2% 66.6% 40.0% 43.8% 55.8% 56.2% 45.7%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2009 7/7 2.4 2.7 57.9% 66.4% 44.3% 42.4% 39.2% 57.3% 32.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 47.8% 40.9% 45.8% 54.5% 25.0% 43.5% 32.7%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 577/627 5.1 4.1 56.8% 71.3% 50.0% 58.5% 43.1% 62.1% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Dominik Hrbaty
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 1996 1486 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 1997 1715 142.2 +1.61 -0.42 1.004 50.2% -92 +38 — 49.1% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 11–10 (52%) 102.0 -1.58
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 1998 1690 141.2 -0.50 +0.95 1.009 50.1% -58 +83 — 52.9% +0.21 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 98.0 -0.64
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 1999 1700 144.9 +1.84 +1.64 1.086 51.5% -29 +125 — 54.6% +0.55 14–10 (58%) 9–14 (39%) 99.7 -0.52
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2000 1835 148.4 +2.28 +2.25 1.120 51.8% -19 -21 — 55.5% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 12–12 (50%) 101.1 +0.54
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -69 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2001 1677 137.6 -1.21 +1.03 0.983 49.6% +75 -12 — 50.0% -0.07 10–10 (50%) 19–11 (63%) 101.7 +1.46
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2002 1671 135.6 -1.20 +0.37 0.964 49.6% +27 -7 — 43.9% -0.24 7–7 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 96.5 +0.59
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2003 1670 138.9 +1.39 +1.61 1.088 51.2% -3 +27 — 50.8% +0.13 4–12 (25%) 9–11 (45%) 92.0 -0.71
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2004 1740 144.0 +2.13 +2.58 1.135 52.4% +38 -62 -263 58.5% +0.63 14–7 (67%) 12–9 (57%) 104.5 +2.00
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2005 1823 147.1 -0.18 +3.32 1.071 51.2% +25 -104 -310 56.9% +0.52 8–8 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 98.4 +1.59
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2006 1803 139.3 -1.67 +2.09 0.992 49.8% +39 -81 -302 48.6% -0.03 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) 102.7 +2.37
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2007 1596 123.7 -3.83 +0.87 0.902 47.6% +90 +13 — 36.8% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 10–8 (56%) 92.8 +1.43
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2008 1571 124.3 -3.12 +4.09 1.044 50.2% +62 +9 — 33.3% -0.80 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.05
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2009 1651 116.6 -2.65 -1.02 0.757 44.5% +45 — — 36.8% -1.52 0–2 1–0 — +0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 105.9 -0.65 +0.69 0.578 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1587 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1942 145.2 +0.15 +1.64 1.034 50.5% +18 +24 -291 51.1% +0.14 96–102 (48%) 115–112 (51%) 97.7 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.