H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Dominik Hrbaty H2H: 1-0
David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-0 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Dominik Hrbaty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 |