H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 2-0

David Nalbandian holds a 2–0 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2011 Shanghai Masters first round 7-5 6-4.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #57 7-5 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #51 Match data Oct 11, 2011* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
David Nalbandian #7 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) Ernests Gulbis #80 Match data Mar 16, 2008* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6
32 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Ernests Gulbis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 3 1 4 75.0%
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2020 2 2 4 50.0%
32 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Ernests Gulbis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9%
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8%
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8%
32 —/— 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% 59.2% 13.4%
Career 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Ernests Gulbis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) +0.44
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.08 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) 93.8 -0.98
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) 102.1 -2.63
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) 97.2 -2.12
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) 103.9 -0.88
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) 96.1 -0.23
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 101.4 -0.91
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) 102.2 -3.49
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) 109.5 -0.35
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 95.1 +2.08
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 93.9 -0.62
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.03
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) 105.6 +0.38
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) 93.7 +0.02
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) -0.77 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) -0.23
32 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% 0.0% -2.75 +0.24
33 2022 1483 103.6
Career 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.