H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-2

David Nalbandian and Fabrice Santoro are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2006 Australian Open quarterfinal 7-5 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 27, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard David Nalbandian #4 7-5 6-0 6-0 Fabrice Santoro #65 Match data
May 4, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fabrice Santoro #54 6-4 1-6 6-4 David Nalbandian #10 Match data
Apr 24, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #9 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #76 Match data
Oct 19, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #50 6-0 6-2 David Nalbandian #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6