H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-0

David Nalbandian holds a 2–0 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2006 Swiss Indoors round of 16 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #3 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(7) Feliciano Lopez #80 Match data Oct 27, 2006* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Nalbandian #21 6-4 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #37 Match data Aug 10, 2003* QF Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Feliciano Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Feliciano Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1%
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Feliciano Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -69 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.