H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Fernando Gonzalez H2H: 5-2

David Nalbandian holds a 5–2 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2006 Vienna quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-1.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 2006* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #10 3-6 6-3 6-1 David Nalbandian #4 Match data
Sep 4, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard David Nalbandian #11 7-5 6-3 6-0 Fernando Gonzalez #23 Match data
Aug 18, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #18 3-6 6-1 6-2 David Nalbandian #11 Match data
Jan 23, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard David Nalbandian #9 6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #16 Match data
May 18, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay David Nalbandian #13 5-7 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #23 Match data
Oct 27, 2002* Basel ATP 250 F Carpet David Nalbandian #18 6-4 6-3 6-2 Fernando Gonzalez #20 Match data
Feb 22, 2002* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #48 6-3 1-6 7-6(5) Fernando Gonzalez #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Fernando Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11