H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 0-3

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–0 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2011 Queen's Club fourth round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 2011* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Fernando Verdasco #23 7-5 6-1 David Nalbandian #24 Match data
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #8 6-2 3-6 6-3 6-2 David Nalbandian #33 Match data
Jul 2, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Fernando Verdasco #30 7-6(9) 7-6(9) 6-2 David Nalbandian #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7