H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 3-1

David Nalbandian holds a 3–1 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2006 Rome Masters second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Nalbandian #3 6-2 3-6 6-3 Fernando Vicente #89 Match data
Feb 20, 2003* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #9 6-3 7-5 Fernando Vicente #48 Match data
Sep 28, 2001* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #65 6-4 6-4 Fernando Vicente #54 Match data
Feb 22, 2001* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Vicente #36 4-6 7-5 7-6(5) David Nalbandian #165 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 158 212 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Fernando Vicente
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,570 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,655 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,638 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2000 23–31 42.6% #47 1,615 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,637 0 3
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,600 0 3
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,593 0 3
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,508 0 3
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,484 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,489 0 3