H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Florian Mayer H2H: 2-1

David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Florian Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Florian Mayer won the 2011 Shanghai Masters third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Florian Mayer
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Florian Mayer #23 6-3 6-4 David Nalbandian #57 Match data
Oct 28, 2005* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet David Nalbandian #10 6-3 6-2 Florian Mayer #81 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard David Nalbandian #8 6-1 6-0 6-3 Florian Mayer #219 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Florian Mayer #256 #18 1,735 1,955 227 250 47.6% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Florian Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2004 19–16 54.3% #35 1,739 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2005 20–24 45.5% #72 1,725 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2006 24–21 53.3% #56 1,719 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2007 17–23 42.5% #55 1,618 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2008 2–9 18.2% #409 1,537 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2009 3–6 33.3% #61 1,666 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2010 21–19 52.5% #37 1,798 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2011 42–24 63.6% #23 1,939 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2012 19–24 44.2% #28 1,795 0 1
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2013 27–25 51.9% #40 1,861 0 1
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2014 7–7 50.0% #147 1,887 0 1
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2015 4–9 30.8% #217 1,788 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #50 1,829 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 10–17 37.0% #69 1,766 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2018 2–15 11.8% #256 1,596 0 2