H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 0-1

Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2004 Roland Garros semifinal 6-3 7-6(5) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gaston Gaudio
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gaston Gaudio #44 6-3 7-6(5) 6-0 David Nalbandian #8 Match data Jun 6, 2004* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Gaston Gaudio #1,025 #5 2,440 1,995 253 189 57.2% 1 0 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Gaston Gaudio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1999 8–15 34.8% #72 1,531 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2000 27–25 51.9% #34 1,648 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2001 23–23 50.0% #48 1,691 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2002 39–17 69.6% #21 1,828 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2003 34–23 59.6% #34 1,764 0 2
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2004 35–24 59.3% #10 1,805 1 3
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2005 54–20 73.0% #10 1,869 1 8
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2006 26–20 56.5% #34 1,697 1 8
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2007 6–15 28.6% #182 1,625 1 8
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2008 0–1 0.0% #969 1,605 1 8
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2009 1–5 16.7% #167 1,525 1 8
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2010 0–1 0.0% #326 1,467 1 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Gaston Gaudio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 12 9 21 57.1% 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 27 12 39 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 29 12 41 70.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 8 9 17 47.1% 41 7 48 85.4% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 5 6 11 45.5% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 48 66 114 42.1% 193 103 296 65.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 10 14 24 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 411/442 of Gaston Gaudio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Gaston Gaudio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 1999 21/23 2.1 3.5 58.6% 61.3% 49.4% 54.6% 44.0% 56.2% 40.6%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2000 42/52 2.2 3.1 60.8% 66.4% 47.8% 56.3% 44.2% 59.0% 39.9%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2001 41/46 3.2 2.7 60.3% 68.6% 52.0% 60.6% 40.5% 62.0% 38.1%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2002 47/56 3.9 2.4 62.9% 70.4% 55.2% 57.1% 49.1% 64.4% 42.2%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2003 54/57 2.8 2.9 63.0% 67.1% 50.6% 52.2% 46.0% 61.0% 40.8%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2004 59/59 2.4 3.0 63.1% 68.5% 49.9% 57.0% 47.5% 61.7% 41.8%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2005 73/74 2.8 2.9 62.1% 68.4% 52.3% 60.7% 45.0% 62.2% 43.8%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2006 46/46 2.8 3.6 61.9% 68.2% 49.1% 55.6% 43.3% 61.0% 40.8%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2007 20/21 1.3 5.1 60.9% 62.6% 44.4% 44.9% 42.0% 55.4% 35.9%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 53.1% 30.8% 47.8% 33.3% 40.0% 38.8% 37.0%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2009 6/6 1.7 5.0 64.9% 62.2% 40.2% 53.9% 54.7% 54.8% 39.1%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2010 1/1 3.0 1.0 75.6% 63.2% 68.2% 81.8% 16.7% 64.4% 34.8%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 411/442 2.7 3.1 62.0% 67.4% 50.5% 56.4% 45.1% 60.9% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Gaston Gaudio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 1999 1532 120.2 -3.16 +1.21 0.925 48.6% — +61 — 33.3% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.9 -0.13
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 2000 1648 139.2 -1.88 +1.92 0.975 49.6% -157 +157 — 50.8% -0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–4 (71%) 103.6 -0.67
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2001 1691 142.7 -0.10 +0.88 1.001 50.0% -102 +74 — 51.7% -0.01 6–11 (35%) 15–9 (63%) 101.7 +0.14
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2002 1828 154.5 +2.21 +3.81 1.188 53.1% -81 +154 — 64.1% +0.82 11–6 (65%) 13–9 (59%) 105.8 -0.72
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2003 1764 144.0 +0.25 +2.55 1.046 50.7% -73 +146 — 56.0% +0.41 17–10 (63%) 6–13 (32%) 96.5 +0.01
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2004 1806 148.5 +0.07 +4.61 1.092 51.5% -162 +199 — 58.0% +0.48 9–11 (45%) 9–12 (43%) 93.6 -1.50
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2005 1870 154.2 +0.77 +5.42 1.158 52.8% -146 +244 — 65.7% +0.95 16–6 (73%) 11–10 (52%) 105.3 +1.99
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2006 1697 131.9 -1.41 +2.09 1.047 50.8% -45 +240 — 55.4% +0.22 9–9 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 95.0 +3.39
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2007 1626 110.3 -4.55 -0.35 0.804 45.1% -16 +88 — 31.5% -1.76 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.67
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2008 1605 96.3 -2.10 -4.49 0.605 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2009 1525 113.6 -2.51 -0.87 0.865 46.9% — +95 — 25.0% -1.81 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2010 1467 98.5 -3.63 -2.53 0.978 49.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1995 147.2 -0.36 +2.93 1.049 50.8% -111 +165 — 54.9% +0.22 82–74 (53%) 74–69 (52%) 99.3 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.