H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-2

David Nalbandian and Guillermo Canas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2007 Argentina Open round robin 6-4 6-4.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 2
4 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Canas #63 6-4 6-4 David Nalbandian #10 Match data Feb 19, 2007 RR Argentina Open International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Canas #26 6-4 2-6 6-3 David Nalbandian #10 Match data Oct 16, 2004* QF Vienna Open International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-2 6-1 Guillermo Canas #248 Match data Jan 28, 2004* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
David Nalbandian #18 4-6 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Canas #16 Match data Oct 17, 2002* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 1,991 245 189 56.5% 0 1 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,461 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,460 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,480 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,839 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,856 0 3
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,804 0 3
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,900 0 6
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,870 0 6
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,817 0 7
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2008 22–20 52.4% #79 1,684 0 7
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,626 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Guillermo Canas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2001 19 10 29 65.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 16 8 24 66.7% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 5 4 9 55.6%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 19 8 27 70.4% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2005 7 3 10 70.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4%
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2007 15 10 25 60.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2008 9 9 18 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% 97 78 175 55.4% 117 82 199 58.8% 26 18 44 59.1% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Guillermo Canas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% 1996 1/3 1.0 4.0 47.6% 62.5% 54.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 40.7%
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% 1997 5/5 5.2 2.8 50.9% 70.7% 47.1% 52.2% 43.1% 58.5% 38.0%
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 1998 14/20 5.4 3.8 53.2% 72.2% 46.0% 62.4% 40.8% 59.7% 37.0%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 1999 31/38 2.8 3.1 57.2% 69.1% 52.5% 63.4% 42.8% 61.6% 41.1%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2000 15/17 3.8 4.3 53.3% 67.7% 44.7% 44.1% 44.4% 57.1% 38.5%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2001 57/66 5.8 2.7 60.7% 71.3% 51.9% 58.7% 44.3% 63.7% 42.8%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2002 58/63 5.2 2.6 59.7% 73.3% 54.6% 56.6% 43.3% 65.7% 41.4%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2003 9/9 4.9 4.6 62.9% 71.5% 46.3% 60.8% 35.2% 62.1% 39.9%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2004 61/61 4.8 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 54.8% 59.2% 48.3% 66.0% 41.5%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2005 32/33 3.5 2.4 60.6% 70.6% 53.3% 63.3% 47.0% 64.3% 43.3%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% —/—
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2007 58/59 5.7 2.1 57.3% 73.5% 52.7% 60.3% 48.0% 64.7% 40.5%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2008 39/42 5.9 2.9 53.9% 71.1% 50.0% 54.1% 44.9% 61.4% 38.9%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2009 18/18 5.8 3.2 51.2% 73.2% 49.3% 62.8% 49.0% 62.0% 35.9%
Career 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% 398/434 5.0 2.9 57.7% 72.0% 52.0% 58.7% 45.3% 63.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Guillermo Canas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.08 1996 1462 97.5 +1.04 -2.26 0.976 49.1% 25.0% -1.62 0–2 1–0 +0.33
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 1997 1461 111.0 +1.67 -1.40 0.916 47.7% +43 33.3% -1.25 0–2 1–0 -0.22
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 1998 1481 121.3 -1.19 -0.67 0.917 48.3% +38 +4 +126 40.4% -0.50 1–6 (14%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 +0.36
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 1999 1575 128.1 +0.38 +2.60 1.070 51.2% -99 +35 +40 42.7% -0.46 3–7 (30%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 -1.21
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2000 1530 126.2 -2.48 +0.32 0.898 47.3% -56 +30 34.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.39
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2001 1839 149.5 +2.44 +4.53 1.177 52.9% -76 -16 -135 60.0% +0.79 15–5 (75%) 9–13 (41%) 109.3 +0.72
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2002 1856 149.5 +2.94 +3.27 1.208 53.1% -23 +31 -142 60.5% +0.74 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) 98.1 +1.54
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2003 1804 118.1 -0.44 +1.57 1.054 50.7% -9 52.2% +0.09 2–0 3–2 (60%) +0.24
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2004 1901 152.0 +3.45 +3.93 1.218 53.4% +11 +13 -212 61.9% +0.86 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.4 -1.25
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2005 1871 147.8 +2.24 +5.12 1.212 53.3% +67 +11 -120 64.1% +1.00 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 +0.92
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2007 1818 155.4 +2.37 +3.32 1.149 52.4% +52 +124 -35 64.0% +0.84 5–7 (42%) 18–6 (75%) 103.0 -1.01
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2008 1685 140.5 -1.38 +1.60 1.006 50.1% +67 +164 +92 48.0% 0.00 8–5 (62%) 5–12 (29%) 94.1 +1.08
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) -0.77 2009 1627 123.4 -1.48 -0.18 0.946 49.5% +28 +135 37.5% -0.44 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) 89.2 +0.68
Career 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 1992 149.7 +1.54 +2.98 1.119 51.9% 0 +50 -51 54.9% +0.39 60–69 (47%) 81–78 (51%) 97.0 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.