H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-2

David Nalbandian and Guillermo Canas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2007 Buenos Aires round-robin match 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2007 Buenos Aires ATP 250 RR Clay Guillermo Canas #63 6-4 6-4 David Nalbandian #10 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Guillermo Canas #26 6-4 2-6 6-3 David Nalbandian #10 Match data
Jan 28, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-2 6-1 Guillermo Canas #248 Match data
Oct 17, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #18 4-6 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Canas #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7