H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Guillermo Coria H2H: 2-3

Guillermo Coria holds a 3–2 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Guillermo Coria leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2005 Masters Cup round-robin match 7-5 6-4.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 14, 2005 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Carpet David Nalbandian #12 7-5 6-4 Guillermo Coria #6 Match data
Jan 26, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard David Nalbandian #9 5-7 7-5 6-3 6-0 Guillermo Coria #6 Match data
Apr 25, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Guillermo Coria #4 6-4 6-3 David Nalbandian #9 Match data
Oct 26, 2003* Basel ATP 250 F Carpet Guillermo Coria #5 (w/o) David Nalbandian #9 Match data
Feb 22, 2003* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Guillermo Coria #36 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) David Nalbandian #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Guillermo Coria #1,121 #3 3,770 2,114 211 113 65.1% 0 2 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Guillermo Coria
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #88 1,547 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2001 26–15 63.4% #44 1,698 0 1
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 22–16 57.9% #45 1,762 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2003 61–17 78.2% #5 2,009 0 6
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2004 37–15 71.2% #7 1,923 0 8
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2005 49–24 67.1% #8 1,865 0 9
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2006 11–14 44.0% #116 1,671 0 9
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 2–8 20.0% #577 1,575 0 9
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11