H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 0-1

Horacio Zeballos holds a 1–0 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2011 Chile Open second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Horacio Zeballos
ARG Age 41 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio Zeballos #108 6-2 7-5 David Nalbandian #19 Match data Feb 4, 2011* R16 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Horacio Zeballos #841 #39 1,027 1,877 87 131 39.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Horacio Zeballos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2009 5–5 50.0% #45 1,613 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2010 14–26 35.0% #110 1,595 0 0
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2011 5–6 45.5% #109 1,598 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2012 3–9 25.0% #85 1,591 0 0
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2013 14–23 37.8% #56 1,587 0 1
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2014 7–9 43.8% #123 1,633 0 1
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2015 2–4 33.3% #124 1,645 0 1
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2016 7–13 35.0% #71 1,670 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2017 20–22 47.6% #66 1,759 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2018 10–14 41.7% #173 1,721 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Horacio Zeballos
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 5 13 18 27.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 5 8 37.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 30 51 81 37.0% 55 69 124 44.4% 2 11 13 15.4% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 218/218 of Horacio Zeballos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Horacio Zeballos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2009 10/10 6.8 2.7 65.2% 71.0% 57.0% 65.7% 54.8% 66.1% 32.9%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2010 40/40 5.8 2.2 63.1% 67.6% 47.7% 60.4% 40.6% 60.5% 32.0%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2011 11/11 6.0 2.7 61.9% 73.7% 49.3% 65.4% 44.9% 64.3% 34.0%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2012 12/12 5.5 2.8 62.0% 67.1% 51.1% 62.2% 33.6% 61.2% 33.9%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2013 37/37 5.6 2.7 62.6% 69.2% 49.1% 59.1% 36.2% 61.6% 30.6%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2014 16/16 4.0 1.8 59.1% 72.9% 52.7% 59.2% 36.6% 64.5% 30.5%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2015 6/6 7.2 2.8 62.6% 67.8% 44.1% 67.3% 35.5% 59.1% 31.0%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2016 20/20 6.2 3.1 60.1% 72.6% 51.9% 55.7% 34.3% 64.1% 28.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 42/42 5.8 2.2 64.1% 71.2% 54.7% 56.0% 37.5% 65.0% 32.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 24/24 6.4 3.0 63.5% 71.6% 50.7% 69.3% 38.9% 64.1% 31.6%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 218/218 5.8 2.5 62.6% 70.3% 51.0% 60.6% 38.6% 63.0% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Horacio Zeballos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2007 1461 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2008 1506 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2009 1613 122.4 +1.10 -2.29 0.970 50.1% +38 — — 53.8% +0.27 0–2 6–5 (55%) — +0.76
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2010 1595 130.9 -1.88 -3.97 0.808 46.6% -14 +43 -118 37.2% -1.03 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 99.7 +0.16
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2011 1598 122.3 +1.03 -2.09 0.954 49.5% — +59 — 48.0% -0.04 0–1 3–4 (43%) — -0.49
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2012 1591 117.8 -2.87 -2.13 0.873 48.1% — +83 — 31.0% -0.66 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.33
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2013 1587 139.5 -1.23 -4.62 0.798 46.8% -106 +128 — 39.6% -0.52 10–5 (67%) 6–13 (32%) 103.9 +1.72
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2014 1633 127.6 +0.28 -3.69 0.858 48.3% -130 +105 — 41.7% -0.45 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.6 +0.69
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2015 1645 109.3 -1.33 -2.33 0.758 45.3% — +91 — 35.7% -1.72 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2016 1671 134.9 +0.65 -5.16 0.790 47.3% -42 -28 -181 38.3% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.8 +0.23
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1759 146.3 +0.83 -2.99 0.928 48.8% -104 +58 — 45.6% -0.27 8–4 (67%) 13–13 (50%) 106.3 -1.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1721 138.6 +0.08 -3.27 0.880 48.8% -71 +37 — 43.9% -0.35 4–6 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 98.5 -1.23
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1705 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1877 137.5 -0.40 -3.58 0.854 47.8% -57 +70 -150 41.4% -0.54 32–29 (52%) 52–65 (44%) 103.5 +0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.