H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Nalbandian | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |