H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 2-2

David Nalbandian and Janko Tipsarevic are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(4) 6-2.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Janko Tipsarevic #8 6-4 7-6(4) 6-2 David Nalbandian #40 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #9 7-5 6-3 David Nalbandian #50 Match data
Mar 13, 2012* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #74 6-3 3-6 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #10 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Nalbandian #8 6-7(5) 4-6 7-6(2) 6-0 2-1 (ret.) Janko Tipsarevic #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
35 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4