H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 8-5
David Nalbandian holds a 8–5 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 6–5 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 Miami Masters first round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
8
–
5
13 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-4 4-2 (ret.) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2009* | Sydney | ATP 250 | F | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-7(9) 6-2 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2008* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-1 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2007* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 7-6(3) | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 2-6 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2005* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-0 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Sep 18, 2004* | Beijing | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2004* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-3 6-4 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 5-7 6-3 6-1 4-6 7-6(3) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2003* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2002* | Estoril | ATP 250 | F | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-4 7-6(5) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Jarkko Nieminen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |