H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Jerome Golmard H2H: 1-0

David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2003 Australian Open round of 128 3-6 6-3 6-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #12 3-6 6-3 6-1 (ret.) Jerome Golmard #141 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,884 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Jerome Golmard
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,424 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,547 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,717 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,842 0 1
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,756 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,660 0 2
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Jerome Golmard
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1995 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 23 13 36 63.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2002 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 85 70 155 54.8% 32 40 72 44.4% 15 17 32 46.9% 9 15 24 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Jerome Golmard
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 1994 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 67.2% 58.0% 61.1% 41.7% 62.7% 35.3%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 1995 16/17 5.1 5.4 54.3% 68.1% 47.0% 54.9% 35.2% 58.3% 32.4%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 1996 12/17 3.9 5.4 58.8% 67.5% 39.3% 43.9% 25.7% 55.9% 30.3%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 1997 23/28 4.1 4.0 57.9% 69.5% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 61.4% 33.5%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 1998 40/45 5.1 4.1 62.3% 69.2% 51.2% 63.2% 44.9% 62.2% 36.4%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 1999 29/33 5.1 2.7 57.9% 72.8% 53.3% 54.9% 44.1% 64.3% 37.8%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2000 45/54 6.4 3.4 56.6% 71.0% 53.7% 55.3% 38.7% 63.2% 35.2%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2001 42/48 5.4 3.2 60.3% 71.8% 49.2% 53.8% 46.7% 62.9% 38.4%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2002 21/27 6.9 4.0 61.4% 77.0% 51.6% 51.5% 35.9% 66.9% 38.2%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2003 3/3 2.7 6.7 53.2% 74.7% 62.6% 51.2% 87.5% 69.1% 30.6%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2004 9/9 8.0 4.3 56.4% 73.1% 51.8% 42.1% 45.8% 63.8% 34.6%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 242/283 5.5 3.8 58.8% 71.2% 50.9% 54.8% 41.8% 62.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Jerome Golmard
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 1994 1514 111.9 +2.11 -0.88 0.946 49.6% — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 1–1 — -0.06
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 1995 1550 131.8 -1.50 -2.68 0.777 45.9% +22 +6 — 40.0% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 6–1 (86%) 102.9 +0.02
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 1996 1425 100.2 -4.28 -4.47 0.687 44.2% +138 +11 — 29.5% -1.25 1–5 (17%) 0–1 — +1.31
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 1997 1547 122.9 -0.42 -3.18 0.869 47.8% +25 -86 +102 46.4% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 102.1 +0.72
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 1998 1718 137.1 +0.32 -1.03 0.965 49.6% -39 -228 +12 54.7% +0.22 6–8 (43%) 9–9 (50%) 102.9 -1.08
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 1999 1843 150.8 +3.05 +0.79 1.059 50.9% -30 -209 — 64.2% +0.94 5–3 (63%) 9–6 (60%) 108.3 -1.75
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2000 1757 145.2 +0.97 -1.36 0.957 49.3% +32 -125 -46 55.6% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 9–8 (53%) 102.7 -0.62
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2001 1747 137.2 +1.00 +0.19 1.035 50.7% +8 -18 -101 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 95.5 +0.06
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2002 1700 136.6 +2.40 +0.61 1.153 52.2% +64 — — 56.1% +0.12 2–5 (29%) 8–2 (80%) 99.6 +0.65
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2003 1628 97.6 +2.49 -4.05 0.991 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.20
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2004 1661 113.6 -0.53 -2.50 0.955 49.2% +96 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.9 +0.70
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2005 1610 91.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1885 140.8 +0.66 -1.09 0.961 49.4% +20 -84 +6 52.5% +0.11 39–44 (47%) 56–47 (54%) 104.6 +0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.