H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 1-1
David Nalbandian and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2012 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2008* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 |