H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs John Isner H2H: 2-1

David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2012 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) 10-8.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard John Isner #17 4-6 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) 10-8 David Nalbandian #87 Match data
Jan 14, 2011* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard David Nalbandian #27 6-4 7-6(3) John Isner #20 Match data
Aug 18, 2010* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #37 4-5 (ret.) John Isner #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16