H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Juan Carlos Ferrero H2H: 4-3

David Nalbandian holds a 4–3 lead over Juan Carlos Ferrero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 3–2 on hard courts, while David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2009 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 6-3 3-0 RET.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 2009* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay David Nalbandian #10 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Juan Carlos Ferrero #93 Match data
Mar 20, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #7 6-2 6-2 Juan Carlos Ferrero #22 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #21 6-1 6-2 6-3 David Nalbandian #10 Match data
Oct 15, 2005* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #22 7-6(5) 6-3 David Nalbandian #9 Match data
Sep 17, 2005* Beijing ATP 250 QF Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #23 6-2 3-6 6-3 David Nalbandian #9 Match data
Nov 10, 2003 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard David Nalbandian #8 6-3 6-1 Juan Carlos Ferrero #2 Match data
Apr 12, 2002* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #47 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) Juan Carlos Ferrero #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Juan Carlos Ferrero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16