H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Juan Monaco H2H: 3-1

David Nalbandian holds a 3–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2012 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2012* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #85 6-3 6-1 Juan Monaco #20 Match data
Feb 21, 2009* Buenos Aires ATP 250 SF Clay Juan Monaco #67 2-6 7-5 7-6(2) David Nalbandian #10 Match data
Apr 30, 2005* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay David Nalbandian #10 6-0 6-4 Juan Monaco #72 Match data
Mar 9, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #10 6-2 6-1 Juan Monaco #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8