H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Luis Horna H2H: 1-1

David Nalbandian and Luis Horna are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Mexican Open semifinal 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Luis Horna
PER Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #8 7-5 6-1 Luis Horna #131 Match data Mar 1, 2008* SF Mexican Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Luis Horna #50 6-4 6-3 David Nalbandian #10 Match data Feb 19, 2007 RR Argentina Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Luis Horna #1,009 #33 945 1,782 113 140 44.7% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Luis Horna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #299 1,493 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #180 1,482 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2001 1–4 20.0% #138 1,464 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2002 6–8 42.9% #85 1,511 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2003 18–20 47.4% #64 1,663 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2004 30–28 51.7% #38 1,730 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2005 16–24 40.0% #84 1,625 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2006 17–22 43.6% #63 1,614 0 1
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2007 17–16 51.5% #73 1,656 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2008 8–16 33.3% #108 1,592 0 2
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Luis Horna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2002 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 13 12 25 52.0% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 7 12 19 36.8% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 32 50 82 39.0% 81 81 162 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 240/252 of Luis Horna's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Luis Horna
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 76.5% 66.7% 58.3% 66.7% — 64.7% 11.1%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 2001 3/5 3.0 3.7 66.2% 65.9% 58.8% 58.6% 10.0% 64.0% 23.0%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2002 13/14 2.9 2.4 72.7% 66.9% 52.1% 63.2% 37.2% 62.5% 40.2%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2003 37/38 3.5 3.1 66.3% 68.6% 49.1% 57.2% 45.9% 61.7% 37.5%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2004 57/58 4.5 2.5 66.8% 69.9% 50.7% 58.5% 38.8% 63.6% 35.8%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2005 40/40 7.4 3.1 64.9% 71.9% 48.2% 55.3% 39.2% 63.4% 32.3%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2006 37/39 5.4 2.5 65.9% 69.1% 53.7% 65.3% 38.7% 63.9% 33.6%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2007 28/33 4.4 2.6 69.1% 69.8% 48.3% 54.1% 49.1% 62.9% 34.7%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2008 24/24 3.9 2.4 69.4% 68.1% 50.2% 49.9% 36.7% 62.9% 32.4%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 240/253 4.8 2.7 67.2% 69.5% 50.4% 57.7% 40.3% 63.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Luis Horna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1494 103.8 +1.77 -0.60 0.315 39.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 1999 1482 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.05
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 2000 1501 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 2001 1465 102.0 +0.58 -2.77 0.639 44.9% — +18 — 33.3% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — +0.29
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 2002 1512 123.0 +0.31 +0.70 1.074 51.4% +41 -18 — 47.1% +0.06 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.59
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2003 1663 136.4 -0.30 +0.01 0.979 49.8% -165 +53 — 52.7% +0.11 2–8 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 96.6 -0.58
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2004 1730 141.9 +1.11 -0.90 0.983 49.8% -88 +49 — 51.2% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 16–9 (64%) 107.2 -0.90
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2005 1625 122.7 +0.10 -3.95 0.882 48.2% -43 +51 — 42.7% -0.48 6–8 (43%) 10–15 (40%) 94.7 +0.50
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2006 1615 134.1 +0.95 -3.08 0.929 49.2% +11 +14 — 52.5% +0.30 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 98.7 -0.24
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2007 1656 133.8 +0.17 -2.10 0.935 49.4% -38 +30 — 52.6% +0.36 5–5 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 101.7 -0.70
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2008 1593 128.7 +0.23 -3.29 0.872 47.8% -49 +110 — 40.0% -0.67 1–6 (14%) 6–7 (46%) 93.6 -0.35
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2009 1595 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1782 137.1 +0.45 -1.92 0.939 49.2% -54 +44 — 48.3% -0.08 25–41 (38%) 53–55 (49%) 95.1 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.