H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0

David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2010 Miami Open first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #161 6-3 6-2 Lukasz Kubot #43 Match data Mar 26, 2010* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.