H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-1
David Nalbandian and Marc Gicquel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on grass, while David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2009 Australian Open first round 6-1 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-1 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2007* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Marc Gicquel | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |