H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 2-3

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 3–2 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2010 Washington final 6-2 7-6(4).

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2010* Washington ATP 500 F Hard David Nalbandian #117 6-2 7-6(4) Marcos Baghdatis #25 Match data
Jul 1, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #16 6-2 7-5 6-0 David Nalbandian #25 Match data
Jan 29, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #54 3-6 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-4 David Nalbandian #4 Match data
Oct 29, 2005* Basel ATP 250 SF Carpet Marcos Baghdatis #85 6-2 7-6(3) David Nalbandian #10 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Nalbandian #11 0-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4