H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-2

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on hard courts, while David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2010 Monte Carlo Masters third round 4-6 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2010* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #151 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data
Sep 3, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #38 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 2-6 6-4 David Nalbandian #9 Match data
Jul 28, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #46 3-6 6-3 6-4 David Nalbandian #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10