H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 4-2

David Nalbandian holds a 4–2 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2013 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2013* Sao Paulo ATP 250 QF Clay David Nalbandian #93 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(3) Nicolas Almagro #11 Match data
Jan 15, 2011* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard David Nalbandian #27 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #14 Match data
Apr 24, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #15 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #22 Match data
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #21 6-4 7-5 David Nalbandian #7 Match data
Mar 2, 2008* Acapulco ATP 500 F Clay Nicolas Almagro #28 6-1 7-6(1) David Nalbandian #8 Match data
Oct 30, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #21 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13