H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 4-0
David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2009 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2009* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2005* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | David Nalbandian | 6-4 6-4 4-6 4-6 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |