H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 2-0

David Nalbandian holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Queen's Club fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 13, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Mahut #46 Match data
May 4, 2006* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #4 7-5 7-5 Nicolas Mahut #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4