H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 4-4

David Nalbandian and Nikolay Davydenko are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round 6-4 5-7 6-3.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #9 6-4 5-7 6-3 David Nalbandian #15 Match data
Nov 1, 2008* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard David Nalbandian #8 6-1 5-7 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Jun 5, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 7-6(1) 3-6 7-6(2) David Nalbandian #18 Match data
Jun 9, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay David Nalbandian #3 6-3 6-3 2-6 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
May 7, 2006* Estoril ATP 250 F Clay David Nalbandian #4 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Nov 21, 2005* Masters Cup ATP Finals SF Carpet David Nalbandian #6 6-0 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Apr 24, 2003* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #44 6-3 7-6(4) David Nalbandian #12 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #80 6-3 6-2 David Nalbandian #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21