H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Olivier Rochus H2H: 2-0
David Nalbandian holds a 2–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-4 6-3 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2001* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6-1 6-0 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Olivier Rochus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 |