H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 2-1
David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Paradorn Srichaphan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2006 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2005* | Basel | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-2 | Paradorn Srichaphan | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2004* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-1 | Paradorn Srichaphan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |