H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 4-0

David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2009 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Nalbandian #15 6-4 3-6 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #39 Match data
Mar 11, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #10 6-7(3) 6-2 6-0 Paul-Henri Mathieu #63 Match data
May 11, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #3 6-2 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #40 Match data
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass David Nalbandian #32 7-6(3) 7-6(7) 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4