H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 2-1

David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2007 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-5 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 2007* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #59 7-5 4-1 (ret.) David Nalbandian #12 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #10 1-6 7-5 7-6(1) Philipp Kohlschreiber #59 Match data
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Nalbandian #13 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #271 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Philipp Kohlschreiber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7