H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-1

David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-6(1) 0-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 18, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #7 7-6(1) 0-6 7-6(6) Radek Stepanek #29 Match data
Mar 25, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #3 6-3 6-4 Radek Stepanek #16 Match data
Feb 17, 2005* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #28 6-2 4-6 6-1 David Nalbandian #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5