H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Robin Soderling H2H: 4-1

David Nalbandian holds a 4–1 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2010 Canada Masters fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-1.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #45 4-6 6-4 6-1 Robin Soderling #5 Match data
Oct 12, 2008* Stockholm ATP 250 F Hard David Nalbandian #7 6-2 5-7 6-3 Robin Soderling #35 Match data
May 11, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Robin Soderling #37 7-6(8) 7-5 David Nalbandian #11 Match data
Oct 21, 2004* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #10 7-6(5) 6-3 Robin Soderling #34 Match data
May 5, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-4 Robin Soderling #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11