H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Sebastien Grosjean H2H: 2-1
David Nalbandian holds a 2–1 lead over Sebastien Grosjean in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sebastien Grosjean leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2007 Australian Open third round 5-7 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 5-7 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 6-1 | Sebastien Grosjean | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2005* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-4 6-7(9) 6-3 | Sebastien Grosjean | Match data |
| May 9, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Sebastien Grosjean | #720 | #4 | 2,865 | 1,960 | 320 | 236 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Sebastien Grosjean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #88 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #10 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #170 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #677 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,578 | 0 | 4 |