H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Shao-Xuan Zeng H2H: 1-0
David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Shao-Xuan Zeng in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-1 | Shao-Xuan Zeng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,078 | 358 | 187 | 65.7% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Shao-Xuan Zeng | #544 | #299 | 141 | 1,534 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Nalbandian | Shao-Xuan Zeng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #680 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #898 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 2,001 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #601 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,909 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #723 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,983 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #300 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,941 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,034 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,014 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,964 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #82 | 1,880 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,869 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |